NIGERIA: Of subsidy and insensitivity
Editor's Choice

Most...
Submitted by Chu Nwanze on Thu, 12/01/2012 - 11:11am
We hear the losses incurred by the country are in the region of N320 Billion on a daily basis and it is perharps a bit frightening to imagine how depleted various businesses would have their treasuries making after a one-week strike for instance.
So what really has the government on one side, and Labour on the other, achieved in one week? But wait a minute, this is not a fight by Labour...it is a fight by Nigerians.
Some state governments have already started imposing curfews as tensions rise and the questions in my mind keep brewing and I ask why did the government just not take some soft options?
How about a phased removal of subsidy?
Why could the Jonathan administration not take away the fuel subsidy gradually over an 18 -24 month period? This would have surely provided us with a deliberate pathway on how they intends to "re-invest" the gains of subsidy removal.
It is evident that this government has turned a blind eye to us, the ordinary Nigerian citizen; they have taken our patience and understanding for granted.
When I say this government is increasingly getting insensitive, I mean every word of it.
It is certain that from the actions of this week, they have learnt that power really belongs to the people, not as a manifesto of politics or sweet nothings they murmur to hype 160 Million people, but as the truth they see across the country!
Editor's Quote: "The test of democracy is freedom of criticism". D. Ben-Gurion





Comments
#1 When Religion Becomes A Problem
Submitted by Ogunjimi James Taiwo (not verified) on Mon, 06/02/2012 - 3:02am.
When Religion Becomes A Problem Ogunjimi James Taiwo "It is possible that mankind is on the threshold of a golden age; but if so, it will be necessary first to slay the dragon that guards the door, and this dragon is religion." - Bertrand Russel When the fuel subsidy removal saga started, I remember postinga comment about religion that some people felt they needed to attack me for. I still recall that the reactions to my posts then were the longest chain of reactions that I ever got. It made me wonder then, and I sat down and thought, What if this whole multitude - that are so deep in religion that they gullibly follow instructions without asking questions, would be told by their religious leaders that they have a part to play in nation building and national unity, what a great country we'll have. The reactions I got then perhaps caused my hesitation to write on religion when the Boko Haram saga intensified and people began to criticize Islam for Boko Haram's actions. Like Dave Barry said, "The problem with writing about religion is that you run the risk of offending sincerely religious people, and then they come after you." I have however decided to end my silence as far as terrorism and religion are concerned. When I say that religion in this context has become a problem, I'm not referring to what people practice and they still think for themselves; I am referring to what people practice that their religious leaders now think on their behalf. I am referring to what people practice that their religious leaders determine the name they'll give their unborn child, I'm talking of what people practice that their religious leaders tell them what to eat, what to wear, where to go, and even who to marry. I am referring to gullible followership that leaves no room for questioning the leader, where going against his/her instructions means that you'll be sentenced to hell/hades. Georgia Harkness stressed this that, "The tendency to turn human judgement into divine commands makes religion one of the most dangerous forces in the world." It amazed me that during the fuel subsidy removal protests, most influential pastors were silent, and even went further to criticize the pastors who spoke out against government's evil actions. Their actions makes me wonder if they see themselves as Nigerians and if they even know that they have a part to play in nation building. Mahatma Gandhi said, "A religion that takes no account of practical affairs and does not help to solve them is no religion." It is high time people broke away from gullibly following religious leaders who won't lend their voices to speak against evil in the nation. TERRORISM & RELIGION "Disturbances in society are nevermore fearful than when those who are stirring up the trouble can use the pretext of religion to mask their true designs." - Denis Diderot When the Boko Haram sect started their operations, little did people expect that they will become a terrorist group that would strike fear in the heart of even the bravest of men. The failure of government to wipe out the sect caused their development into a dreaded group. Instead of the government admitting its errors and looking for solutions, they have resorted to witch-hunting of people who they believe are sponsors or affiliates of Boko Haram. I then ask, what result has their witch-hunting yielded? Have they been able to stop the sect from wreaking more havoc? NO. Let us reason it out, if there is to be an end to terrorism in Nigeria, the responsibility does not only lie in the hands of political leaders; religious leaders need to act. Both Christian leaders and Muslim leaders need to correctly sensitize their followers on the dangers of religious extremism. Islamic leaders need to come together and openly speak against the acts of terrorism being carried out in the name of Islam, they need to gather the Islamic youths together and think of ways to reclaim their religion from these religion hijackers. The Christian leaders must make their followers understand that Islam isn't their problem, but the perversion of Islam. They shouldn't be the ones who will sow seeds of discord and disunity in the minds of their followers. I have Islamic friends and I will frown at anyone who calls them terrorists, but the Islamic leaders need to reassure everyone that Islam is against terrorism. Pervez Musharraf said,"Islam teaches tolerance, not hatred; universal brotherhood, not enmity; peace, and not violence." People need reassurance and it is the duty of religious leaders to reassure them. If the religious leaders fail in this, then there is no basis for religion if it promotes hatred instead of love, if it allows war instead of peace, and if it causes division instead of national unity. Any religion that threatens our existence as brothers should be subjected to the fire of reality to determine if it deserves to exist.
Post new comment